Home > Compound List > Product Information
Vinflunine Tartrate_Molecular_structure_CAS_1201898-17-0)
Click picture or here to close

Vinflunine Tartrate

Catalog No. S2209 Name Selleck Chemicals
CAS Number 1201898-17-0 Website http://www.selleckchem.com
M. F. C49H60F2N4O14 Telephone (877) 796-6397
M. W. 967.0159064 Fax (832) 582-8590
Purity Email sales@selleckchem.com
Storage -20°C Chembase ID: 72901

SYNONYMS

IUPAC name
(2R,3R)-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioic acid methyl (1R,9R,10S,11R,12R,19R)-11-(acetyloxy)-4-[(12S,14R,16R)-16-(1,1-difluoroethyl)-12-(methoxycarbonyl)-1,10-diazatetracyclo[12.3.1.0^{3,11}.0^{4,9}]octadeca-3(11),4,6,8-tetraen-12-yl]-12-ethyl-10-hydroxy-5-methoxy-8-methyl-8,16-diazapentacyclo[10.6.1.0^{1,9}.0^{2,7}.0^{16,19}]nonadeca-2,4,6,13-tetraene-10-carboxylate
IUPAC Traditional name
L-tartaric acid; vinflunine

DATABASE IDS

CAS Number 1201898-17-0

PROPERTIES

Target Microtubule formation
Salt Data Tartrate
Storage Condition -20°C

DETAILS

Description (English)
Research Area
Description Cancer
Biological Activity
Description Vinflunine is a new vinca alkaloid uniquely fluorinated with the properties of mitotic-arresting and tubulin-interacting activity.
Targets Microtubule
IC50 1.2 μM [1]
In Vitro The major effects of Vinflunine on dynamic instability are a slowing of the microtubule growth rate, an increase in growth duration, and a reduction in shortening duration. The effects of Vinflunine on the readmilling rate is examined by following [3H]GTP incorporation into MAP-rich microtubules, and the IC50 is 0.42 μM. [1] Vinflunine induced mitotic accumulation with IC50 with 18.8 nM, which decreases the centromere dynamicity by 44% and increases the time centromeres spent ina paused state by 63%. [2] Vinflunine ditartrate exhibits microtubule inhibition (purified tubulin and MTP) and cytotoxicity in L1210 cells with IC50 of (0.49 μM and 3.5 μM) and 97 nM, respectively. [3] Vinflunine induces apoptosis in neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells through a postmitotic G1 arrest and a mitochondrial pathway in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 with 50 nM. sup>[4] Treatment of Vinflunine induces a rapid change in endothelial cell shape: cells retracts and assumes a rounded morphology. Mean IC50 values are 9.9 × 10-5 M × 10-5 M for fibronectin and 5.0× 10-5-5-8-4-7 × 10-7 M. [5]
In Vivo Intravenous treatment of mice with Vinflunine, immediately before and 2 day afterMatrigel implantation, results in a dose-dependent inhibition of the bFGF-induced angiogenic response, compared with vehicle-treated animals. Inhibition of haemoglobin content is significant at 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg, with no effect at 0.63 mg/kg (P > 0.05). An ID50 value (dose which inhibits 50% of bFGF-induced neovascularisation) is calculated as 1 mg/kg. Low doses of Vinflunine reduce the number of experimental liver metastases by human LS174T colon cancer cell. A slight overall decrease in liver metastatic foci is already observed at the very low dose of 0.16 mg/kg Vinflunine, although maximal overall inhibition was reached at the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of 20 mg/kg. [5]
Clinical Trials Vinflunine is now under the Phase 2 clinical trial to clarify the benefit/risk ration of cytotoxics in CDDP-unfit patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma.
Features
Combination Therapy
Description Vinflunine combined with Pazopanib is under the Phase 2 clinical trail in urothelial cancer of the bladder.
Protocol
Kinase Assay [1]
Determination of Microtubule Polymer Mass Purified tubulin (17 μM) is polymerized into microtubules in the abence or presence of a range of vnflunine concentrations (35 minutes; 37 °C) in 75 mM PIPES, 1.8 mM MgCl2, 1.0 mM EGTA, and 1.5 mM GTP (pH 6.8) using sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) axonemes as seeds for assembly initiation. After incubation, polymerized microtubules are separated from unpolymerized tubulin by centrifugation (150,000 × g; 1 hour; 35 °C). The supernatant is aspirated, the sedimented microtubules are depolymerized in assembly buffer by incubation on ice (2 hours), and the protein content is determined.
Microtubule Inhibition PC-tubulin (1.8 mg/mL) is polymerized in 100 mM MES, pH 6.9, 10 mM MgSO4, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM GTP, and 2 M glycerol Experiments are carried out in the presence and absence of test compounds over concentration ranges of 0.1 to 1 μM. Microtubule formation is monitored using a Gilford Response II UV-Vis or a Varian Cary 3E scanning spectrophotometer equipped with a cooling Peltier cell holder. Prior to polymerization, samples are degassed on ice for 30 minutes, and baseline data are collected at 4 °C and 350 nm. The temperature was increased to 37 °C, and solutions are monitored at 350 nm for 45 minutes. Solutions are cooled to 0 °C, and a second baseline is recorded. The change in optical density is plotted vs compound concentration after subtracting the second baseline from the plateau optical density at 45 minutes. This ΔOD corresponds tothe temperature-sensitive reversible polymerization and corrects for irreversible aggregation. The percent inhibition is calculated relative to the control sample. The IC50 concentration (drug concentration causing 50% inhibition of microtubule assembly) is determined from the mean of three independent experiments.
Cell Assay [3]
Cell Lines Leukemic L1210 cell
Concentrations 0-1μM
Incubation Time 48 hours
Methods Effects of Vinflunine on L1210 cell proliferation are determined using a standard growth inhibition assay. Exponentially growing L1210 cells (1.5 × 105 cells/well) in a 24-well plate are exposed to a range of concentrations of test compounds for 48 hours, prior to determining cell numbers using an electronic particle counter based on linear interpolation between data points.
Animal Study [5]
Animal Models LS174T tumor cells are injected into the spleen of BALB/C nude mice.
Formulation Vinflunine is solubilized in a saline solution (0.9% NaCl).
Doses ~20 mg/kg
Administration Administered via i.v. on days 4, 7, 11, 14, 18 and 21 after tumor cell implantation.
References
[1] Ngan VK, et al, Cancer Res, 2000, 60(18), 5045-5051.
[2] Lobert S, et al, Biochemistry, 2000, 39(39), 12053-12062.
[3] Okauneva T, et al, Mol Cancer Ther, 2003, 2(5), 427-436.
[4] Pourroy B, et al, Mol Pharmacol, 2004, 66(3), 580-591.
[5] Kruczynski A, et al, Eur J Cancer, 2006, 42(16), 2821-2832.