Home > Compound List > Product Information
Methazolastone_Molecular_structure_CAS_85622-93-1)
Click picture or here to close

Methazolastone

Catalog No. S1237 Name Selleck Chemicals
CAS Number 85622-93-1 Website http://www.selleckchem.com
M. F. C7H7N5O2 Telephone (877) 796-6397
M. W. 193.16278 Fax (832) 582-8590
Purity Email sales@selleckchem.com
Storage -20°C Chembase ID: 72587

SYNONYMS

IUPAC name
3-methyl-4-oxo-3H,4H-imidazo[4,3-c][1,2,4]triazine-8-carboxamide
IUPAC Traditional name
3-methyl-4-oxo-3H-imidazo[4,3-c][1,2,4]triazine-8-carboxamide
Synonyms
Temozolomide
Temodar
Temodal

DATABASE IDS

CAS Number 85622-93-1

PROPERTIES

Salt Data Free Base
Solubility DMSO
Storage Condition -20°C

DETAILS

Description (English)
Research Area
Description Cancer
Biological Activity
Description Methazolastone (Temozolomide, Temodar, Temodal) is a DNA damage inducer.
Targets
IC50
In Vitro Methazolastone causes formation of DNA alkali-labile sites which are present in similar amounts and repaired at a similar rate in L-1210 and L-1210/BCNU. In L-1210 but not in L-1210/BCNU methazolastone induces an arrest of cells in SL-G2-M phases. Methazolastone induces a similar amount of DNA ALS which is also repaired at a similar rate in L-1210 and L-1210/BCNU cell lines. Methazolastone induces a similar amount of DNA ALS which is also repaired at a similar rate in L-1210 and L-1210/BCNU cell lines. [1] Methazolastone sensitivity of both chemo-sensitive and resistant cells (D54-R and U87-R) is enhanced significantly under hyperoxia. Both Methazolastone and hyperoxia are associated with increased phosphorylation of ERK p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2), but to a lesser extent in D54-R cells, suggesting that Erk1/2 activity may be involved in regulation of hyperoxia and Methazolastone-mediated cell death. Hyperoxia enhances Methazolastone toxicity in GBM cells by induction of apoptosis, possibly via MAPK-related pathways. [2] Methazolastone induces in monocytes the DNA damage response pathways ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 resulting in p53 activation. [3] Chronic Methazolastone exposure results in acquired Methazolastone-resistance and elevates miR-21 expression. [4] Methazolastone treatment triggers endoplasmic reticula (ER) stress with increased expression of GADD153 and GRP78 proteins, and deceases pro-caspase 12 protein. Methazolastone induces autophagy through mitochondrial damage- and ER stress-dependent mechanisms to protect glioma cells. [5]
In Vivo After a daily i.p. dose of 40 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days (days 1-5 after tumor transplant), methazolastone increases life-span by 86% in L-1210 and 22% in L-1210/BCNU. In L-1210/BCNU no effect is seen after 100 μM or 200 μM treatment; only 400 μM methazolastone produced an accumulation of cells in premitotic phase but much less than in L-1210. In L-1210/BCNU the maximum accumulation of cells in SL-G2-M is, after 48 hours-72 hours, approximately 30% as compared to 23% in untreated cells. Cells accumulates in SL-G2-M occurred too when L- 1210 leukemia-bearing mice are treated i.v. with methazola stone (40 mg/kg). No such effect is seen on L-1210/BCNU cells from mice given the same drug dose. [1]
Clinical Trials Methazolastone plus TPI 287 has entered in a phase II clinical trial in the treatment of melanoma.
Features Methazolastone is a second-generation alkylating agent.
Protocol
Cell Assay [1]
Cell Lines L-1210 and L-1210/BCNU cells
Concentrations 0 μM -100 μM
Incubation Time l hours
Methods L-1210 and L-1210/BCNU cells are seeded at 0.2 × 104 cells/mL and incubated for 24 hours. The cultures are treated with Methazolastone for l hours at 37oC, then washed twice in PBS by centrifugation and resuspended in fresh medium. Controls and treated samples are diluted in fresh medium 1:4 at 48 hours and 1:2 at 96 hours. Using these dilutions cell concentrations throughout the experiments are between 3 × 105 and 8 × 105/mL. Control growth is logarithmic in this range.
Animal Study [1]
Animal Models DBA/2 mice with L-1210 and L-1210/BCNU cells
Formulation 95% ethanol
Doses 40 mg/kg
Administration Administered via i.v.
References
[1] Catapano CV, et al. Cancer Res. 1987, 47(18), 4884-4889.
[2] Sun S, et al. J Neurooncol. 2012.
[3] Bauer M, et al. PLoS One. 2012, 7(6):e39956.
[4] Wong ST, et al. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32(7), 2835-2841.
[5] Lin CJ, et al. PLoS One. 2012, 7(6), e38706.
[6] Gori JL, et al. Cancer Gene Ther. 2012.